This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Know of a great band you think we'd like to hear about? Got some music news? Or just want to talk about music in general? Post it here.

Moderators: Jonicont, mark lynn, Maluca3, Tequila Cowboy, BigTom, CooleyGirl, olwiggum

Post Reply
User avatar
Smitty
Posts: 10900
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Fruithurst, Al
Contact:

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Smitty »

I'm as big a shill for DBT as it gets but I'm not about to say anything they do musically is particularly new or even unique, they just do it better than damn near if not anyone else
E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle.

User avatar
Tequila Cowboy
Site Admin
Posts: 20230
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:12 pm
Location: The Twilight Zone, along with everyone else

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Tequila Cowboy »

Smitty wrote:I'm as big a shill for DBT as it gets but I'm not about to say anything they do musically is particularly new or even unique, they just do it better than damn near if not anyone else


Exactly!!!
We call him Scooby Do, but Scooby doesn’t do. Scooby, is not involved

User avatar
RevMatt
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:13 pm
Location: Normaltown, USA
Contact:

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by RevMatt »

Too many posts to respond individually.

First, I apologize to anyone who feels I've been condescending. It is not my intention but, unfortunately, one's intentions are not always communicated well online. I didn't see the point in comparing a DBT song with something like a Raymond Carver short story or poem because most people are not familiar with his work. Doesn't mean you aren't well read or anything. Short fiction just isn't everyone's cup of tea. If you were to compare a certain rock song with an opera the comparison would go over my head because I know absolutely nothing about opera. Same if I were to compare a Patterson Hood song with a Robert Stone story. More people bought the last Truckers album than the last Tobias Wolff short story collection. That's all I was trying to say.

Second, I've spoken to dozens of DBT fans, both online and in person. When we talk about why we like Drive By Truckers 99% of the time it comes down to the songs. Most people express the sentiment that DBT's songs are different. People regard them the same way they regard their favorite films, books, plays and cable dramas. For the most part these people are lifelong music fans who have been to hundreds of shows and know the history of rock music like the back of their hand. Hell, many people on this board witnessed historic moments in music, though at the time they may not have known the significance of what they were seeing. Most of the people express the sentiment that The Truckers speak to them like no other band has ever spoken to them. My response is usually something like, "They ought to. They are doing things differently with their songs." It is not that they are reaching fences that other artists can't reach. They are swinging for different fences altogether.

Honestly, I don't really get bothered about the debates we have on this board. It keeps things interesting. I can laugh off the references people make to "Watershed Moments", Townes Van Zandt comparisons and whether or not I have the hots for Shonna Tucker. (I don't. Maybe I would if she looked more like the painting on the Eye Candy album cover.) But what puzzles me if we spent the better part of two years on this board doing the "Song of The Week" feature where in some cases there were several pages of posts offering different interpretations of various songs. If you go to the "Former Members" board there are currently over 40 posts where people are discussing their interpretations of "Elephant". Rock songs usually don't inspire this sort of behavior, even from their most rabid fans. Plays, films, poems, novels and short stories, however, do inspire this. You can even earn a bachelors, masters or PhD doing the sort of analysis of "literature" that we do as a matter of course on some of the better Drive By Truckers songs.

Why is this? Is it because we are just a bunch of obsessive Trekies who have latched onto a particular band and message board and if the Drive By Truckers weren't around we'd be doing this on the Lucero board or something? Or is it because over the course of a career that spans from Gangstabilly through Go Go Boots this band has raised songwriting to a whole new level, going places where others haven't and saying things that haven't been said before in songs? Personally, I say it is the latter. I am reminded of what the so-called dirty realists like Raymond Carver, Andre Dubus and Tobias Wolff started doing with The Short Story in the late 1970's and early 1980's. I don't know if The Truckers were influenced by this movement -- I don't think they were, I think with Patterson and Cooley it was a combination of film, hip hop lyrics, Springsteen, Tom T. Hall and their overly ambitious goal of recording a two disc rock opera about the region and era they grew up in. (Isbell, however, did major in English and is supposedly only a couple credits shy of a degree.)

Again, not trying to cut anyone down or even hijack a thread. (This all started when I posted two top five lists, one made up of my personal faves, the other of bands I consider with impressive legacies. I had both Fogerty and DBT on my legacy list and was called on it.)
I have nowhere else to go. There is no demand in the priesthood for elderly drug addicts

User avatar
Tequila Cowboy
Site Admin
Posts: 20230
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:12 pm
Location: The Twilight Zone, along with everyone else

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Tequila Cowboy »

Fair enough Rev. A few quick responses:

- Unlike you I guess I would just assume that the vast majority of folks on this board have read Raymond Carver although I could be wrong about that. If they haven't they've read some southern based writers that have worked in the short story form like William Faulkner or, from a more recent vintage, Larry Brown. Either way I thinks folks around here are a pretty literary sort which I thought you would have known based on past threads/conversations.
- I also think that a lot of us are as a group are the obsessive type and if it wasn't DBT we'd be talking about something else. In fact many of us do be it sports, books, movies, TV, etc.
- It has never once occurred to me that the obsessive discussion of DBT is something inherent to the band or the kind of songs they write. That being said the many layers of the songs and records do lend themselves to that kind of scrutiny so I do see why it attracts certain kinds of folks. I just think that saying that's the reason is a bit of a stretch. In fact I think there are many, many reasons people are attracted to DBT and their music.
- All of the above notwithstanding I DO think DBT have something special or I wouldn't have spent the last ten years following them. They are great songwriters, great performers and above all very interesting people which comes across in interviews, blog posts, etc. They are no doubt right there with the masters of the story song format, if you want to classify them as such. I just think we have to careful when raising them up to such lofty heights, particularly in terms of innovation. I don't really think they invented anything but like Smitty pointed out they sure do what they do as well or better than anyone else.
- I sure am guilty of the of hyperbole that I think you fell victim to here. I've been there before and as I said I want to be more careful about it in the future. I just think we all have to be careful of opinions we present as facts. lotusamerica's post last week that called both of us out on this has weighed heavily on me ever since. It's fine, just something to think about.
We call him Scooby Do, but Scooby doesn’t do. Scooby, is not involved

User avatar
Kudzu Guillotine
Posts: 11761
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:46 am

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Kudzu Guillotine »

Smitty wrote:I'm as big a shill for DBT as it gets but I'm not about to say anything they do musically is particularly new or even unique, they just do it better than damn near if not anyone else


For some reason this has always stayed with me but way back when I was first getting into the Truckers, someone that wasn't nearly as big a fan as myself (and quite possibly wasn't a fan at all) said something along the lines of, "they weren't bad in concert but their fans acted like they were the best thing they'd ever seen".

User avatar
dime in the gutter
Posts: 9015
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 5:46 pm

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by dime in the gutter »

hyperbole presented as fact is highly underrated. i say more of it. give us all something to shoot at.

here's one....john fogerty is the greatest rock and roll singer of all time. prove it wrong.

keep em coming revmatt and tc. how often does one get to post bon jovi lyrics? not often enough, i say.

User avatar
sactochris
Posts: 2581
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:47 pm
Location: Orangevale, California

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by sactochris »

I disagree with revmatt, if you don't know who Raymond Carver was, you can't be considered well read.
Keep calm and have a cigar

User avatar
tinnitus photography
Posts: 7264
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:49 pm
Contact:

Re: John Fogerty

Post by tinnitus photography »

Beebs wrote:
rlipps wrote:Willie Nelson is gonna be pissed that Fogerty is honing in on his turf.


Fogerty is playing FarmAid this year.


uh, i didn't see him.

i am just catching up on this (hilarious) thread, and i had no idea he'd put out a collab LP this year. i think TC wrote the review on discogs:

During the late 1960’s and early 70’s, John Fogerty was not only the voice of Creedence Clearwater Revival, he was the voice of a generation, laying out cryptic country blues that were interlaced with a brilliant rock sound that has never gone out of fashion, and is as instantly recognized today, as it was then. Though having said that, I’m not sure I need this grouping of songs, and even more-so, I’m not sure that I need this album artwork ... because the packaging pretty much says it all.

John’s reached that age where people want to record with him, if for nothing else, than to say they have, and in that spirit I’m more than sure that John’s reaching for a younger generation who may find their way to him through the backdoor of their current country and rock heros. Some reviewers [Rolling Stone] have stated that John seems to be having a lot of fun, but to me this all sounds a bit like a karaoke script, where other artists step in at their appointed line and deliver just what they’re expected to deliver ... filling in the blanks, often sounding like they’re sleepwalking, and never finding the groove. And it’s this notion of “finding the groove,” that’s so important, because other than Bob Seger, none of these people were around when this grouping of songs first hit the radio, they have no personal connection to these songs or to the relevance these songs held for the times from which they blossomed.

Just hearing Kid Rock using his voice modulator on “Born On The Bayou” was enough to make want to turn on my dusty boot heels and spit into the wind, while the Foo Fighters saturated “Fortunate Son” with their own brand of high octane that left me feeling a bit uncomfortable to say the least. I’ve been to Fogerty concerts, I’ve been to CCR shows, I’ve always been enchanted when someone who’s been hanging out backstage is asked to step up and splinter the floorboards with the band, where it actually did sound like the collaboration was fun, and the guests do rock back, breathing it all in like fine wine on the palette, morphing into something greater. But this is not great, it’s not even the less is more approach, and when the publication Country Weekly tries to insist that Wrote A Song For Everyone is somehow mesmerizing, where you can feel the mutual love and respect, that fact is, this is just flat, sad and boring ... pretty much as sad as the album jacket makes me feel.

beantownbubba
Posts: 21796
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:52 am
Location: Trying to stay focused on the righteous path

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by beantownbubba »

dime in the gutter wrote:how often does one get to post bon jovi lyrics? not often enough, i say.


Now that's just silly.
What used to be is gone and what ought to be ought not to be so hard

Iowan
Posts: 12063
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:00 am
Location: Oneota watershed

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Iowan »

dime in the gutter wrote:hyperbole presented as fact is highly underrated. i say more of it. give us all something to shoot at.


If Shonna Tucker had re-positioned her amp, she would be the next Loretta Lynn.

User avatar
Tequila Cowboy
Site Admin
Posts: 20230
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:12 pm
Location: The Twilight Zone, along with everyone else

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Tequila Cowboy »

sactochris wrote:I disagree with revmatt, if you don't know who Raymond Carver was, you can't be considered well read.


Indeed
We call him Scooby Do, but Scooby doesn’t do. Scooby, is not involved

User avatar
one belt loop
Posts: 3772
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:02 pm
Location: East Bay

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by one belt loop »

I'd say more Kurt Vonnegut than Raymond Carver.
Matt playing like an evil motherfucker w/ rhythm with a capital MPLAEMWR.

- bubba

User avatar
GW in IA
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:46 pm
Location: You're never too old to go to Space Camp dude.

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by GW in IA »

Are we talking about Carver, the peanut butter guy?
Reluctantly, our hero rises to the day, with a moan and a curse to an absent God.

User avatar
Steve French
Posts: 2889
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:26 am
Location: Had no idea what it was but what's an extra 20?

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Steve French »

one belt loop wrote:I'd say more Kurt Vonnegut than Raymond Carver.


I just want to say whoever re-named this thread did a hell of a job.

hell of a job.
I've never taken a pissbreak during a DBT show but if I had it would have been during Dancing Ricky.

User avatar
Steve French
Posts: 2889
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:26 am
Location: Had no idea what it was but what's an extra 20?

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Steve French »

GW in IA wrote:Are we talking about Carver, the peanut butter guy?


maybe John Carter? from Mars?


great, underrated film by the way
I've never taken a pissbreak during a DBT show but if I had it would have been during Dancing Ricky.

User avatar
Steve French
Posts: 2889
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:26 am
Location: Had no idea what it was but what's an extra 20?

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Steve French »

Tequila Cowboy wrote:
sactochris wrote:I disagree with revmatt, if you don't know who Raymond Carver was, you can't be considered well read.


Indeed


Shit, some of us are just catching up with our Elmore Leonards. Not to mention our James Ellroys. ANOTHER one for the reading list? Will this be on the test?
I've never taken a pissbreak during a DBT show but if I had it would have been during Dancing Ricky.

User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 1958
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 8:24 am
Location: Richmond, Va.

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Rocky »

Thanks for the thread rename TC. It's more than appropriate.
By the time you drop them I'll be gone
And you'll be right where they fall the rest of your life

Zip City
Posts: 17313
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:59 pm

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Zip City »

CORMAC MCCARTHY FOR LIFE!
And I knew when I woke up Rock N Roll would be here forever

User avatar
Smitty
Posts: 10900
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Fruithurst, Al
Contact:

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Smitty »

If we're just throwing out great author names at random, Larry McMurtry.
E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle.

User avatar
Tequila Cowboy
Site Admin
Posts: 20230
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:12 pm
Location: The Twilight Zone, along with everyone else

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Tequila Cowboy »

I think RevMatt was primarily referring to short story writers but even with that there are plenty of them, Ray Bradbury, Neil Gaiman, Kurt Vonnegut, Larry Brown and even Stephen King all come to mind pretty quickly.
We call him Scooby Do, but Scooby doesn’t do. Scooby, is not involved

User avatar
Smitty
Posts: 10900
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Fruithurst, Al
Contact:

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Smitty »

Tequila Cowboy wrote:I think RevMatt was primarily referring to short story writers but even with that there are plenty of them, Ray Bradbury, Neil Gaiman, Kurt Vonnegut, Larry Brown and even Stephen King all come to mind pretty quickly.


Ok, Faulkner, Welty, Hemingway, O'Connor,Poe & Fitzgerald.
E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle.

User avatar
Tequila Cowboy
Site Admin
Posts: 20230
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:12 pm
Location: The Twilight Zone, along with everyone else

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Tequila Cowboy »

Smitty wrote:
Tequila Cowboy wrote:I think RevMatt was primarily referring to short story writers but even with that there are plenty of them, Ray Bradbury, Neil Gaiman, Kurt Vonnegut, Larry Brown and even Stephen King all come to mind pretty quickly.


Ok, Faulkner, Welty, Hemingway, O'Connor,Poe & Fitzgerald.


All good ones.
We call him Scooby Do, but Scooby doesn’t do. Scooby, is not involved

beantownbubba
Posts: 21796
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:52 am
Location: Trying to stay focused on the righteous path

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by beantownbubba »

E=MC(squared)

Just sayin'.
What used to be is gone and what ought to be ought not to be so hard

User avatar
tinnitus photography
Posts: 7264
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:49 pm
Contact:

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by tinnitus photography »

did we really get to six pages discussing influential American bands w/o a single mention of Sonic Youth?

Bill in CT
Posts: 3491
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:37 pm

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Bill in CT »

As for authors...check out Thomas Ligotti and William T. Vollmann.
The closer you get to the meaning
The sooner you'll know that you're dreaming

User avatar
Tequila Cowboy
Site Admin
Posts: 20230
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:12 pm
Location: The Twilight Zone, along with everyone else

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Tequila Cowboy »

tinnitus photography wrote:did we really get to six pages discussing influential American bands w/o a single mention of Sonic Youth?


Yeah, that ain't right.
We call him Scooby Do, but Scooby doesn’t do. Scooby, is not involved

John A Arkansawyer
Posts: 7894
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 9:51 am
Location: Little Rock, Arkansaw
Contact:

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by John A Arkansawyer »

tinnitus photography wrote:did we really get to six pages discussing influential American bands w/o a single mention of Sonic Youth?


Not anymore. Bastard.
The sooner we put those assholes in the grave&piss on the dirt above it, the better off we'll be

User avatar
Tequila Cowboy
Site Admin
Posts: 20230
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:12 pm
Location: The Twilight Zone, along with everyone else

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by Tequila Cowboy »

John A Arkansawyer wrote:
tinnitus photography wrote:did we really get to six pages discussing influential American bands w/o a single mention of Sonic Youth?


Not anymore. Bastard.


If there was no Sonic Youth there would have been no Nirvana, of course the Replacements figured into that equation too.
We call him Scooby Do, but Scooby doesn’t do. Scooby, is not involved

User avatar
lotusamerica
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:30 pm

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by lotusamerica »

Tequila Cowboy wrote:
- I sure am guilty of the of hyperbole that I think you fell victim to here. I've been there before and as I said I want to be more careful about it in the future. I just think we all have to be careful of opinions we present as facts. lotusamerica's post last week that called both of us out on this has weighed heavily on me ever since. It's fine, just something to think about.


Oh, please don't let anything I ever say on here weigh heavily - it's usually just a passing thought on my end, often phrased however my mood is at the moment.

Well, perhaps other than this: If we don't find some time at one of the shows to have a good margarita together, I may go on to the end of my days drinking Jose Cuervo and that green mixer stuff, possibly even in frozen blender style. Now there's something you should perhaps let weigh heavily on you if you care for me at all, or even just take a simple interest in the well-being of humanity.

User avatar
tinnitus photography
Posts: 7264
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:49 pm
Contact:

Re: This Thread Has Very Little To Do With John Fogerty

Post by tinnitus photography »

this post belonged on pg 2 or 3, but i wanna get in on the action...

top 5 most influential US bands of all time

- Velvet Underground
- Stooges
- Metallica
- Sonic Youth
- Byrds (possibly The Dead or The Airplane, as well)

Ramones was a tough omission.

Post Reply